 Spike Lee 2009 As the BFI celebrates 20 years since the release of Spike Lee's seminal film with The Independent Interview and a season of movies on the Southbank, the director talks to Kaleem Aftab about race and retrospectivesSpike Lee arrives at the BFI Southbank on Monday as part of a celebration of Do The Right Thing, his third film, which premiered at the Cannes film festival in 1989. In the two decades since then, the film has been recognised by the American Film Institute as one of the greatest 100 American movies in film history and was highly listed in a Sight and Sound Poll of the best films of the past 25 years. It was also, as Barack Obama coyly admitted last year, the movie that the President of the United States of America took Michelle to see on their first date. All in all, a far cry from the divisions and debate that the race drama provoked on its release. It was the most controversial and discussed film of that summer. You couldn't pick up a magazine or newspaper without someone having an opinion on the Brooklyn tale or the director. Critics David Denby in New York Magazine and Richard Corliss in Time argued that Do The Right Thing was of no value except as agitprop to incite the black community to riot. In the opposite corner was Roger Ebert who wrote that "it comes closer to reflecting the current state of race relations in America than any other movie of our time". It's not to belittle Lee's other films, including Malcolm X or Inside Man, or his two great documentaries 4 Little Girls about the 1963 church bombing in Birmingham, Alabama and the Katrina documentary When the Levees Broke, to state that Do The Right Thing remains the key work in his oeuvre. The director would never admit that it's his best film. "My films are like my children", he says. "I don't have a favourite." Yet in all the literature that Lee approves, from the children's book he wrote with his lawyer-turned-writer wife Tonya, Please, Baby, Please to the blurbs on the back of DVDs, it's always Do The Right Thing that is given the status of first among equals.
Wellywood is angling to make more money and keep it through new co-production deals being sought with the Hong Kong film industry.
A who's who delegation of film and gaming production executives has addressed the Hong Kong film industry after signing a memorandum of understanding that it is hoped will lead to Chinese money bankrolling New Zealand productions.
The conference, at Hong Kong's HK$2 billion (NZ$460.2 million) digital creative community Cyberport, lists some of Wellington's creative luminaries as speakers, including the head of Peter Jackson's Park Road Post, Aimee McCammon, production veteran Dave Gibson and Jos Ruffell, of leading game makers Sidhe Interactive.
Institute of Screen Innovation director Laurence Greig said the meeting would bring big benefits for the New Zealand industry.
Cyberport and the Hong Kong film producers Shaw Brothers were good examples of large, experienced businesses keen to learn from Wellington, he said.
Cyberport chief executive Nicholas Yang said New Zealand was a role model in the way it had achieved global status and earned international acclaim.
New Zealand already had a co-production treaty with Korea but one had not yet been established under the free trade agreement with China.
"We want to get a framework that will accelerate a co-production treaty so we get groups from China and Hong Kong looking to produce films in Wellington and New Zealand.
"Wellington features on the world stage as a centre of innovation but we haven't got the scale when it comes to capital to produce our own content."
Typically big-scale production houses came to New Zealand to work with the expertise but took all the profit potential away when they left.
More capital access would allow New Zealand companies to own more of what they produced to increase future homegrown earnings off that.
"We are trying to migrate the New Zealand industry from being famous for producing other people's films and games to producing our own and owning the content," Mr Greig said.
Wellington Mayor Kerry Prendergast was a delegate and signed the deal.
This is very cool. Recently saw a blog sharing the true story of making the film Dream Awake. Check out the below the lessons learned through the process.
Looking forward and backward at the same time ...
Guess it's that time of year once again, resolutions and all that? I'll certainly toss out a few here, but more importantly I'd also like to throw out what I'd do different when I shoot my next film. In other words, what lessons did I truly learn from this one? Now some of us might call this listing our regrets, but I prefer taking that in a more positive stride. I mean, aren't we all here to learn, life being quite a demanding school and all that? ...
Lessons Learned (I'm sure there are more)
1) Hire the 1st AD sooner -- Scheduling a low budget indie and then logistically pulling it off is paramount in the low budget realm. A good 1st AD is essential to making that happen. We had him, but he came aboard awful late in prep. That did handcuff us some, but it wasn't deadly. However, next time that will be higher on my priority list ...
2) Hire an editor for the shoot -- I now see the logic of that. Having someone doing a rough cut when we were shooting certainly would have helped, not only to see what we had but to insure that we go after what we didn't ...
3) Hire a publicist before, during and after the shoot -- Is there such a thing as too much publicity? For indies like us I doubt it, but when it's very minimal you're starting out of the gate behind the curve. We didn't hit this one right ...
4) Hire someone to really control the budget -- Since we didn't do #1 on cue, that put us behind the momentum of the shoot in keeping track of cash, cash flow and cash reserves. Having someone experienced and aware of this should help close that gap ...
5) Be more competent -- This one I direct directly at me, being the director and all, and everything else I was, or still am. As a perfectionist at heart, I was sometimes disheartened at how thin I had to spread myself out. I knew sometimes I had to set certain priorities of the moment and let other things drop by the wayside, always hoping others could pick up the slack. Sometimes that happened, sometimes not. But no matter what, I was (am) always responsible in the end ...
6) Fewer challenging locations -- Yeah, let's go film a feature on a high mountain and bring up a lot of people and equipment where no motorized vehicles can go. And then let's do it in the heat of the summer and go where there are no facilities for everyone. And let's do it all low budget under the regulations of the federal government and local Native American tribes. Right ...
7) More prep time -- Don't we always want this luxury? Yeah, but I only want a couple more days. Just a couple more, can't I? It may seem that upfront more prep time will add to the budget, but properly managed more prep time can certainly save you time (and money) on the back end ...
8) Less post time -- This is only so because ours has gone on longer than normal, and certainly longer than was ever intended. If we had done things normally, this probably wouldn't be here. Anyway, next time we will have a real Post Supervisor, as I've shockingly realized this is not my forte ...
9) More $$$$$ -- Ha, no brainer, huh? Cash dough, we can always stand to swim with more. The trick is taking those extra dollars and stretching them out better than before, since this is where the rubber will always meet the road. Good luck doing that in this economy. You may have to hit up that rich eccentric Uncle, or learn to count cards in Vegas ...
10) Less hats to wear -- As a low budget indie filmmaker this is usually difficult to avoid. But, please forget about the romance of being a filmmaker, because just being in love with the idea of being a filmmaker can never sustain you when you have to actually do the hard work. On the other side of that coin, when those hard realities do set in, don't try and to do it all. You may harm the project beyond what you can repair. In other words, get out of the way of your ego and don't fall in love with yourself ...
11) Relax & have more fun -- At the heart of it all. Always keep your vision and grow with it, but let go, relax and have fun within it. There were times I got so caught up in the frenzied moment that I didn't savor it enough before it passed. Each day slow it down a bit and take it all in, because who knows, you may never get to make another film again ...
Internet users would have their connections terminated summarily on the whim of the film and TV industry should it win its landmark legal battle against iiNet, legal experts have warned.
Seven of the world's biggest film studios and the Seven Network last week filed suit against iiNet, Australia's third largest ISP, in the Federal Court. They claim iiNet authorised copyright infringement by failing to prevent its users from downloading pirated movies and TV shows.
iiNet, and the industry body, the Internet Industry Association, say ISPs should not be required to take action against any customers until they have been found guilty of an offence by the courts. ISPs argue that, like Australia Post with letters, they are just providing a service and should not be forced to become copyright police.
Conversely, the TV and movie industry want ISPs to disconnect people it has identified as repeat infringers. There would be no involvement from police or the courts and the industry would simply provide the IP addresses of users they believe to be illegal downloaders. "To shift the burden of proof and require that ISPs terminate access to users upon mere allegations of infringement would be incredibly harmful to individual internet users in Australia," the online users lobby group Electronic Frontiers Australia said.
"Every citizen has a right of due process under the law and, when faced with having their internet service terminated, every citizen has the right to ask that the case against them be proven first."
The iiNet case is similar to the one the music industry brought against the Kazaa file sharing service in 2002, which ended in 2006 with Kazaa's owners handing over $100 million in damages. Additionally, in 2005, Stephen Cooper, the owner of MP3s4free.net, and the website's host, E-Talk Communications, were successfully sued by the music industry for infringing copyright by publishing hyperlinks to sites that contained illegal music.
But Weatherall said both cases were different because they showed a clear knowledge and encouragement of copyright infringement, whereas iiNet simply provides the internet connection and is in no way directly involved with illegal downloading.
Further, the Copyright Act and safe harbour provisions introduced with the US free-trade agreement provide some immunity for ISPs when it comes to the actions of their users. Nic Suzor, an Australian lawyer doing his PhD at the Queensland University of Technology and vice-chairman of EFA, said internet users would face "substantial hardship" if iiNet lost the case.
"ISPs will be terrified of being sued, and will likely disconnect individual users without taking the care to determine the merits of allegations of copyright holders," he said. "There will be no court processes, so individual users will have no ability to contest the allegations, short of suing their service providers. There will be no court processes, so the media will not fully report on the issues, and a lot of the injustices will go unnoticed." John Linton, CEO of the small ISP Exetel, said legal action by copyright holders was "inevitable" and the movie industry's strategy was to "take one or more smaller ISPs to court to test the provisions of the current newer clauses in the Copyright Act".
Unlike iiNet, Exetel forwards infringement complaints from the movie industry to its customers. Linton said iiNet brought the legal action on itself by failing to play ball. Peter Coroneos, chief executive of the Internet Industry Association, said the impending court battle would be "a very important test case for the internet industry in Australia".
The IIA board will meet on Wednesday to discuss a response to the case, which will be before the court on December 17.
It will be very interesting to see how this all plays out!!!
Written by Mitch Santell Today we are in the final days of editing our first release, "Truth, Lies & Misinformation." As I was scouting over the internet today, I found this article that I know will be of inspiration and another idea toward your own production and film. Enjoy and read on......... (this blog is for educational purposes only so be aware that we find the best content on the net and place it right here)........
by Eric D. Snider The Internets are saving independent film again! Often the biggest dilemma for small-time filmmakers is that distributing their movies, whether in theaters or on DVD, costs too much money. So we're seeing more and more films skip theaters, skip DVD, and go straight to the Internet, where movie downloads are becoming increasingly common.
The latest development is that a company called Cinetic Rights Management is releasing its catalog of indie films through Amazon's Video on Demand service and its CreateSpace DVD on Demand system. The arrangement will allow customers to rent or buy digital copies of films that aren't available anywhere else, many of which are just as worthy of being seen as the ones that were lucky enough to get theatrical distribution. (And that often really is the only difference between a movie that makes it to theaters and one that doesn't: luck.)
The new arrangement launches today with the featured title On Broadway (pictured), a gentle comedy about a Boston man who writes and stages a play in the back of his pub. The cast includes Eliza Dushku, Will Arnett, and New Kid on the Block Joey McIntyre.
On Broadway is a new film, but CRM will be releasing many of its older titles through Amazon, too, including the Oscar-winning 1984 documentary The Times of Harvey Milk and 1995's A Modern Affair, a romantic comedy about a man and woman who meet at a fertility clinic. The newer titles include Your Mommy Kills Animals, a documentary about animal-rights extremists; and Happy Birthday, Harris Malden, a rather delightful comedy that I reviewed at CineVegas earlier this year and that I'm glad to see is getting some kind of distribution. And that's really why we're telling you about all this -- because we're excited about the way new technology is making it possible for small films to find audiences. I've never used Amazon's Video on Demand service, I don't know how well it works, and Amazon certainly ain't givin' me a kickback for mentioning it. But it's there, and more and more titles are being made available through it. Digital distribution is the way of the future! I, for one, welcome our new Internet overlords.
|